NHL gets Jovanovski suspension right
Don't skate with your head down. Bad things will happen.
If you've ever played a single shift of competitive contact ice hockey, that is one of the first lessons you are taught. You either learn that lesson from your coaches... or from the little birdies that circle your head after you get destroyed by an opponent with better situational awareness than you have.
That's why some Phoenix Coyotes fans are peeved today that Ed Jovanovski will be missing the next two NHL games for the team.
But with all due respect to my fellow fans, I think they need to do what Jovo himself has to do - suck it up and take it like a man. (Even the women.)
In Monday night's game against the Minnesota Wild, Jovanovski caught Wild forward Andrew Ebbett skating into the offensive zone with his head down. As Ebbett swept towards the right half-boards, Jovo skated to intercept. The big Coyotes blueliner caught Ebbett with his forearm and left glove hand smack in the head, and Ebbett crumpled to the ice with blood flowing from a glove-induced cut. Ebbett would get back to his feet but stumble around the ice until the referee's whistle about twenty seconds later.
If you haven't seen the hit itself, here it is:
Now, it's pretty clear that Ebbett had his head down and was more concerned about his skating than the rather large Coyote curling on a collision course with him. There should be no question about what Ebbett deserved for his inattention - the euphemism is "getting rubbed out," but it really means being suitably destroyed by a hard check.
It's pretty obvious that Jovanovski got the job done. What's at issue is the tools he used and how he used them.
Jovo apologists naturally believe that the smaller Ebbett's size was the reason why Big Ed's forearm connected with the Minnesota forward's face (the argument being that Jovo would have to be on his knees to deliver a body check on a guy that small). There's enough gray area in the height differential, they say, to make the hit at least questionable instead of the cheap shot that it obviously was.
The referees apparently agreed, because Jovanovski didn't get penalized at all for the play. Some Coyotes fans believed that the non-call proved that the hit wasn't dirty (although the idea that a non-call should indicate that a hit is clean is an ironic one, considering the hue and cry over hits like Patrick Kaleta's destruction of Petr Prucha which led to no penalties or suspensions for Kaleta but drew an instigator and misconduct for Martin Hanzal, who fought Kaleta after the hit).
But, for once, Colin Campbell and the League of Extraordinarily Subjective Gentlemen that make up the NHL disciplinary office got the post-game call right. The suspension was the right call because head shots like Jovo's are a completely unnecessary and hazardous part of the game of hockey and should be punished quickly and decisively. The idea that head shots are unavoidable is ridiculous and hockey players know it - they simply take advantage of the erroneous fan sentiment to the contrary and the historic subjectivity of the league to get away with them (see: Mike Richards and David Booth).
This is not to say that the league should take physicality out of the game. A head-shot-free NHL would simply require players to modify their aim a bit. And that's the truth, no matter what the hysterical traditionalist lobby would have you believe. More truth? Head-shotting is the lazy player's way of body checking. It is a cheap facsimilie of a hockey play that once was the prime method of separating a player from the puck. A head shot is as lazy and reprehensible for players who want to play the game right as it would be for a skater to skate with his head down or admire a pass crossing the offensive blue line.
If there is a reason for Coyotes fans to be outraged at the NHL for Jovanovski's suspension, it should be because the league still applies arbitrary and subjective criteria to head shots instead of a consistent and serious penalty for the offense - in other words, that Jovo should (rightly) be penalized and others are (wrongly) left untouched. The fact that the NHL does not take decisive unilateral action only serves to make the problem worse - leading fringe players to try and get their names out on ESPN, TSN, and YouTube by head-shotting an opponent and thereby raising their profile, or more "mainstream" players to do so to create a reputation of toughness in the league that will help them when contract negotiations are up. In other words, as long as there is no concrete and devastating penalty for head-shotting, it will remain a viable (and, in some cases, unpunished) course of action for players.
Fortunately for the Coyotes, they can play and win with Jovanovski out of the lineup. So fans shouldn't worry too much about the effects of Big Ed's suspension. But even if we had to roll with someone like, say, David Hale or Matt Jones on the blueline as a result, I would think that the bigger issue would be what we would have to live with if Jovo got away with a cheap shot. The Coyotes are already under the gun because of the NHL's ownership and the attitude towards our market - adding "cheap-shotting" to the list of our perceived crimes against hockey is something we could live without.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The suspension was the right call because head shots like Jovo’s are a completely unnecessary and hazardous part of the game of hockey and should be punished quickly and decisively
I wish pansies like you would stop trying to ruin hockey. Stick to soccer if you don’t like the violence. Anyone who has watched/played the game for more than 10 minutes knows that skating with your head down = lights out. It’s part of the game, and an entertaining one.
Dude, you are way off base.
Yes, head down means that you are fair game to get rocked, but not fair game for a forearm induced concussion. I love a massive hit as much as anyone (God I miss Ballard) but cheap shots and hits that aren’t clean don’t have a place in the game.
While the NHL’s punishment isn’t consistent, the stance is: no head shots. 2 games is fair.
LETS GO COYOTES!!!
Anyone who has played the game for more than five seconds (or who has played it on actual ice instead of on their XBox) knows that Jovo’s hit was cheap and dirty.
I am a fan of body checking in the manner in which the tactic was created. Few things in hockey are more entertaining than a good, crushing body or hip check.
Forearms to the face, however, are for lame douchebags. And the last thing hockey needs is more douchebags. So if you get your rocks off by watching a guy get concussed, go watch MMA.
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pretty much where I was going to go with this...
I like that the NHL took a stand, and while it didn’t seem so bad during the game itself, it’s fairly close to the Doan hit earlier in the year that also didn’t get a penalty but then did get James Wisnewski a 2 game suspension. THe problem is the NHL needs to find some sort of consistancy as there’s a real reason that the fans have taken to calling it a wheel of justice. too many arbitrary things that happen from game to game. and play to play.
Support Your Local Coyotes Blog - Five For Howling
JaredFromLondon: ...Odin, he's cool.
Precisely. This seems like a reaction to the fact that Booth has a concussion (which sucks, and I hope he feels better real soon)…I agree that it wasn’t a good hit, and Jovo should do a better job of getting down and making sure he contacts the shoulder or the chest.
The only problem I have with Zyllyx’s analysis and what other people are saying is that he “led” with his forearm and glove. Jovo comes in from the side along the boards to take Ebbett out and right as Ebbett comes up to him, Ebbett turns to the inside. Jovo reacts by reaching out with his arms and catching him across the head. This is Jovo being caught suddenly out of position and reaching out to do what he set out to (take Ebbett off the puck). And upon further review, it is dangerous and absolutely deserves a suspension. But it’s not Jovo setting out to slam a guy dangerously in the head, but it did happen and he’ll get to watch from the press box for two games.
I also wouldn’t compare this to the Richards hit, which was devastating for a completely different reason. Richie’s hit was also clean, but I’ve gone through that debate so many times that I don’t really want to re-hash it.
World Ph*cking Champs! That was fun - let's do it again...
by Jordan Ellel on Dec 10, 2009 9:04 AM MST up reply actions
This whole debate centers over the definition of "clean."
I guess my contention is that deliberate hits to the head should not be considered “clean” hits. The NHL obviously disagrees and so do a lot of the fans.
What really steams me the most, though, is the belief expressed by guys like ten_of_sp that it’s an all-or-nothing proposition – that you CAN’T play tough hockey without hits to the head. To me that’s like saying that you can’t bring the puck into the offensive zone with your head up because you can’t see the puck.
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Well, I think the problem is the determination of what is deliberate. I don’t think that either Richards or Jovo deliberately hit these guys in the head. As I mentioned, Jovo went in to make a clean hit, but when Ebbett moved away, his reaction was to reach out and still hit him. I’m sure Jovo would’ve preferred to make contact with Ebbett’s chest/shoulder, but in the 0.002 seconds that he had to react and make contact, he slammed him pretty solid in the head.
Richards came in looking to make a shoulder-to-shoulder hit on Booth (from a weird angle granted)…Booth passes the puck at the last second and turns his head and Richards slams it pretty solidly. I don’t think Richards was deliberately trying to hit Booth’s head there, but it happened.
The question is, do you want to see the NHL simply outlaw hits to the head and take all subjectivity out of the call? In that way, it would become like the delay of game penalty…doesn’t matter that you weren’t trying to lift the puck over the glass, it just happened, so it’s 2 minutes. I’m not sure I want to see that happen. And I think it’s impossible to really judge the intent. The difference (to me) is when a guy goes in to make a theoretically clean hit and the results are a head shot (because of the opponent looking down, turning, freak accident), or when the guy makes a dangerous hit deliberately up high (think, Chris Neil on Drury, or (arguably) the Wisniewski hit on Doan when he launched himself at Doan’s head). I think there’s a difference between those, but I might just be crazy.
World Ph*cking Champs! That was fun - let's do it again...
by Jordan Ellel on Dec 10, 2009 10:20 AM MST up reply actions
I don’t think that cheap shots and intentional head-shotting will stop unless unilateral penalties for head shots are put in place. Yes, a unilateral penalty would make a head shot like the delay-of-game penalty and it would make it pretty agonizing in some situations where the head contact was accidental, but in my opinion the angst is well worth the reduction in the rash of career-threatening and -ending injuries we’re seeing these days.
I certainly think it’s better than no-calls during a game and then slap-on-the-wrist penalties after the fact. To me, that’s no deterrant at all. If a head shot gets an automatic double-minor or a major penalty IN THE GAME, you can bet that the incidents of head-shotting would plummet – intentional AND accidental.
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
See, I think this is where I differ. I’d like to see them do something about the head shots, but if these hits became an automatic double minor or major, then I worry that we’d end up changing the game in a bad way. The refs can’t see everything, and with such an advantage on the line, I think we’d see a lot of players feigning getting hit in the head to earn their team an advantage…I don’t want to see hockey turn any more into basketball or soccer than it already is. It’s bad enough when you have talents like Crosby diving to get a trip or hooking call…can you imagine if they could jerk their head back on a check to the shoulder to sell it as a shot to the head and a 5-minute advantage. That seems like a line I don’t want to cross.
Now the slap-on-the-wrist penalties could be a place to address it. Make it a real foul, and dole them out uniformly so that there is real team consequence to doing things that are reckless. If this Jovo type of foul is a 2-gamer, so be it. If the Richards hit on Booth is a 3 gamer, so be it. But you better get every hit like it (regardless of injury to the player hit) and you better be consistent. The problem is that the NHL is and has been awful about this…
World Ph*cking Champs! That was fun - let's do it again...
by Jordan Ellel on Dec 10, 2009 12:16 PM MST up reply actions
I guess my worry is that if it doesn’t get enforced IN GAME, it won’t make any difference if a penalty comes after the fact. Sure, losing salary and ice time is bad but if your actions directly affect your team’s chances to win the game, the consequences are far wider-ranging.
This is all theory and no reality, though, because the NHL isn’t going to change the way they do business and the fans out there who think hockey hadn’t changed in 75 years before Bettman came along (which is retarded because if that were true we wouldn’t even have the forward pass) would rather be entertained at the expense of the people doing the entertaining…
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Well, I certainly don’t want to keep seeing the players get hurt. I just have problems with a rule against head-shots because it is such a slippery slope. The truth is just that the players keep getting bigger and faster. We need better ways to protect our players. I have high hopes for the future with the new helmets they are testing and hopefully they will move to softer shoulder and elbow pads as well which would cut down on at least some of the damage.
I’m not looking for MMA-level entertainment (and I hate that crap generally)…but I love the fact that hockey is a hard-hitting and fast moving sport. It’s the best sport in the world, bar none and hopefully we can find a way to address the issue without changing much…
World Ph*cking Champs! That was fun - let's do it again...
by Jordan Ellel on Dec 10, 2009 2:48 PM MST up reply actions




























